Competitor profile

M/S AFSANA CONSTRUCTION

They win 17% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
9 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹7.9 Cr bid — 18.8% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
16.7%
27.8%
55.6%
Awarded316.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected527.8%
Lost1055.6%
By value₹7.9 Cr
18.8%
37.2%
43.9%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr18.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.0 Cr37.2%
Lost₹3.5 Cr43.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RWD EinC₹1.3 Cr89.5%
NREP Sahibganj₹10.7 L7.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUMITA DEBI1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
02
GULAVI CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ABDUL RAHMAN3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹14.0 L
won head-to-head
04
SAKIR HUSSAIN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJESH KUMAR SAHA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹15.2 L
won head-to-head
06
MD JAVED AKHTAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAFSANA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S AFSANA CONSTRUCTION

M/S AFSANA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RWD EinC, at 89.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUMITA DEBI, GULAVI CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED and ABDUL RAHMAN. SUMITA DEBI bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S AFSANA CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.