Competitor profile

AFAQUE AHMAD

They win 31% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
13 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
29
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.9 Cr
of ₹17.0 Cr bid — 28.6% conversion
Win rate
31.0%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
31.0%
65.5%
Awarded931.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.4%
Lost1965.5%
By value₹17.0 Cr
28.6%
68.2%
Awarded₹4.9 Cr28.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹55.4 L3.3%
Lost₹11.6 Cr68.2%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

DUMKA ZILA PARISHAD₹1.4 Cr28.9%
RDD Special Division₹1.3 Cr26.2%
N.R.E.P DUMKA₹16.3 L3.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹4.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S GUPTA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MANOHAR LAL AGRAWAL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MD RAHMAT ALI2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹88.8 L
won head-to-head
04
MD ABDUSSALAM ANSARI0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DAUD MIAN1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹12.4 L
won head-to-head
06
SACHIN MANDAL1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAFAQUE AHMAD awardedOthers

About AFAQUE AHMAD

AFAQUE AHMAD appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 31.0% win rate — worth ₹4.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is WRD EinC Major-Med n Minor, at 41.5% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S GUPTA CONSTRUCTION, MANOHAR LAL AGRAWAL and MD RAHMAT ALI. M/S GUPTA CONSTRUCTION bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AFAQUE AHMAD won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.