Competitor profile

ABDUL ATIQUE

They win 38% of what they bid, but only 17% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.7 L
of ₹75.8 L bid — 16.7% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost562.5%
By value₹75.8 L
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded₹12.7 L16.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹63.2 L83.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABDUL MANAN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHRI MANGALNATH CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹19.3 L
won head-to-head
03
PATIDAR BROTHERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹7.7 L
won head-to-head
04
KAYA INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BITUMEN WORLD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
S R CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedABDUL ATIQUE awardedOthers

About ABDUL ATIQUE

ABDUL ATIQUE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹12.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABDUL MANAN, SHRI MANGALNATH CONSTRUCTION and PATIDAR BROTHERS. ABDUL MANAN bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ABDUL ATIQUE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.