Competitor profile

Aaradhana Technology Systems

They win 75% of what they bid — and 93% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
4buyer authorities
0states
21 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.9 L
of ₹54.9 L bid — 92.7% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹54.9 L
92.7%
Awarded₹50.9 L92.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.0 L7.3%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JARC Teknology0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Specialise Products Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MEHTA HITECH INDUSTRIES LIMITED1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.0 L
won head-to-head
04
SAHAJANAND LASER TECHNOLOGY LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SUNTOOLS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAaradhana Technology awardedOthers

About Aaradhana Technology Systems

Aaradhana Technology Systems appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹50.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Rourkela, at 62.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JARC Teknology, Specialise Products Private Limited and MEHTA HITECH INDUSTRIES LIMITED. JARC Teknology bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Aaradhana Technology Systems won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.