Competitor profile

M/S A M WANI CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
11 May 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25.9 L
of ₹3.2 Cr bid — 8.2% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹3.2 Cr
91.8%
Awarded₹25.9 L8.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.9 Cr91.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHABIR AHMED SHAN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S RATTAN CHAND0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Sheetal0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JK Electric Engineers Private Limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM1 win · 1 shared tender
₹24.7 L
won head-to-head
06
BALDEV SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedA M WANI awardedOthers

About M/S A M WANI CONSTRUCTIONS

M/S A M WANI CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹25.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHABIR AHMED SHAN, M/S RATTAN CHAND and Sheetal. SHABIR AHMED SHAN bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S A M WANI CONSTRUCTIONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.